281 Lawyers Apply for Senior Advocate Designation Under Madras High Court’s New Rules

281 Lawyers Apply for Senior Advocate Designation Under Madras High Court’s New Rules As many as 281 lawyers practising before the Madras High Court have applied for designation as Senior…

281 Lawyers Apply for Senior Advocate Designation Under Madras High Court’s New Rules

As many as 281 lawyers practising before the Madras High Court have applied for designation as Senior Advocates under the court’s newly introduced 2026 rules, marking the first designation exercise under the revamped framework.

The Madras High Court published the list of applicants on October 6 and has invited suggestions and views from practising advocates, the Bar Council and relevant bar associations. Submissions, however, must be supported by verifiable material.

The deadline for submitting such views is 5.45 pm on October 27. The exercise is expected to put a large number of applicants through a substantially different assessment process from the one followed under the earlier rules.

The 281 applicants include lawyers whose enrolment dates range from the 1970s to 2015, reflecting the wide range of professional experience among those seeking the Senior Advocate designation.

The latest exercise comes nearly four years after the Madras High Court’s previous round of designations. In January 2023, the Full Court had designated 62 lawyers as Senior Advocates under the earlier framework.

This time, however, the process is governed by the Rules for Designation of Senior Advocates by the High Court of Madras, 2026, which were notified on July 23.

The new rules represent a significant shift in the way advocates are assessed. They were framed following the Supreme Court’s 2025 decision which discarded the earlier 100-point system for assessing candidates for Senior Advocate designation and directed courts to reconsider their existing mechanisms.

The Madras High Court’s 2026 rules consequently move away from the earlier points-based assessment and interview-centred approach.

The composition of the permanent committee has also changed. Under the new framework, it comprises the Chief Justice and the two senior-most judges of the High Court. The earlier system had included the Advocate General and a member of the Bar in the committee.

Under the 2026 rules, an applicant ordinarily needs at least ten years of standing at the Bar and must be at least 45 years old. The Full Court, however, has the power to relax the age requirement.

Applicants are generally expected to practise predominantly before the High Court or a District Court. The rules also provide scope for some relaxation for advocates whose specialised practice is principally before tribunals.

The assessment is intended to look beyond a numerical scoring system. Factors such as advocacy skills, professional ethics, mentoring of junior lawyers, pro bono work, integrity and specialised legal knowledge form part of the broader evaluation.

The Secretariat is also required to gather information relating to an applicant’s reputation, conduct and integrity and place the comprehensive material before the Full Court.

The Full Court will ultimately consider factors including the advocate’s ability, standing at the Bar and special knowledge or experience in law while deciding whether the designation should be conferred.

Another important feature of the new framework is that it has effectively reset the designation process. The 2026 rules repeal the earlier 2020 rules and provide that pending applications, proposals and recommendations under the previous regime are to be returned, requiring advocates to apply afresh under the new rules.

With 281 applications now before the court, the exercise is expected to be closely watched by the legal community. It will provide the first significant test of how the Madras High Court’s new post-100-point-system framework works in practice.

The process also places considerable emphasis on transparency by inviting verifiable objections, suggestions and views from stakeholders before the applications proceed further.

The eventual designations will therefore be significant not only for the individual advocates selected but also for establishing how the Madras High Court interprets and applies its new standards for professional eminence, integrity, legal expertise and standing at the Bar.

Share: f X in @

Ajay Gautam

Ajay Gautam Advocate: Lawyer, Author, Columnist and Poet, Founder of OnlineNewsPortal.In and MediumPulse.com

Call Now: +91-7974026721